Dorset Council (24 019 357)

Category : Adult care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 22 Apr 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the actions of a carer employed by the Care Provider. We could not achieve the outcome Miss X seeks from complaining.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complained the Care Provider enabled a carer to breach professional boundaries, including developing an inappropriate relationship with another member of the family, stealing money and letting themselves into the property outside of scheduled visits.
  2. Miss X said the Care Provider failed to properly investigate the matter and threatened Miss X to try and stop her escalating the matter. Miss X said the events caused her significant distress. She wanted the Care Provider to terminate the carer’s employment.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants, or
  • there is another body better placed to consider this complaint.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X’s complaint is about a carer employed by the Council-commissioned Care Provider. Miss X makes several allegations relating to the carer’s conduct. She complains the Care Provider did not deal with the matter properly when she raised her concerns.
  2. Parts of Miss X’s complaint are better considered police matters; for example, her claim the carer in question stole a significant amount of money and valuable items from her family member. The police are already aware of this allegation.
  3. I have considered whether we should further consider other parts of the complaint which we may have the power to consider. However, we cannot make recommendations relating to termination of employment. This would be a personnel matter for the Care Provider.
  4. If we investigated parts of Miss X’s complaint that may come under our jurisdiction, we could never achieve the outcome Miss X seeks from complaining to us. It is not proportionate for us to consider the matter further.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because we cannot achieve the outcome she seeks from complaining.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings