London Borough of Haringey (24 002 425)

Category : Adult care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 14 Nov 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council communicated with service users following a cyber-attack. Further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained about the Council’s communication following a cyber-attack. He said the cyber-attack left him unable to contact the company that provides his occupational therapy (OT) equipment. He said the Council did not write to service users about the cyber-attack for 11 days.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s communication following the cyberattack. The cyberattack may have been frustrating for Mr X, however there is nothing to suggest his care needs were not met during this period. Although Mr X could not contact the company that provided his OT equipment, he could contact the Council. Therefore, any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.
  2. In addition, in its complaint response, the Council apologised for any delays telling service users about the cyber-attack. It confirmed it had implemented new processes following the incident. It also apologised for not calling Mr X to discuss his complaint before responding. The Council has made improvements to how it deals with cyber-attacks and apologised to Mr X for any failings. Further investigation by the Ombudsman will not lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because further investigation will not lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings