We Do Recover CIC (22 007 831)

Category : Adult care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 Oct 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about We Do Recover. This is because the function complained about falls outside of our jurisdiction.

The complaint

  1. Mrs B complained about the poor quality of the treatment her son, Mr C received from We Do Recover a treatment provider. Mrs B says Mr C signed the agreement whilst under the influence of alcohol and drugs and although they, his parents, paid £6950 for him to undertake the programme We Do Recover did not return calls as promised or provide them with a copy of the terms and conditions. Mrs B says Mr C felt his mental health was not being addressed by the provider and he had to leave after a week after entering the programme. Mrs B says Mr C was told he would have 1:1 sessions because he could not cope in groups. Mrs C accepts she paid a non-refundable deposit but says We Do Recover should reimburse her the rest of the money paid for treatment Mr C did not receive.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. Some elements of drug or alcohol treatment centres are within our jurisdiction. If the company is providing adult social care services which are registrable with the Care Quality Commission, then those aspects of the service are in our jurisdiction to investigate.
  3. However, Mrs B’s complaint is about the contract for and provision of treatment services which falls outside of our role under part 3a of the Local Government Act which is limited to investigating actions in connection with the provision of adult social care services as defined in law.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs B’s complaint because the function complained about is not within our jurisdiction.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings