London Borough of Croydon (21 010 899)

Category : Adult care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 20 Dec 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the emergency alarm service he received between 2015 and 2019. It lies outside our jurisdiction because it is late and I see no good grounds to exercise discretion to consider this very late complaint now.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall call Mr X, complains about matters relating to an emergency alarm service he, and his parents, used between 2015 and 2019.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  3. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
  3. I sent the complainant a copy of my draft decision and considered his comments in response.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complains about charging and safety issues relating to the safety alarm service he and his parents used from 2015 to October 2019. Mr X paid for the service.
  2. Mr X first complained to the Council about this matter in 2016 and again in 2020. The Council signposted Mr X to this office in its 2017 complaint response should he remain dissatisfied with its response and wish to pursue the complaint further.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. The complaint lies outside our jurisdiction because it is late. The law says a complaint should be made to us within 12 months of the person first becoming aware of the matter. Mr X first complained to the Council about this in 2016 and was clearly signposted to us in early 2017. I see no good reason to exercise discretion to consider this very late complaint now, so many years on from Mr X first becoming aware of the matter and from him being clearly signposted to us.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings