Leeds City Council (21 006 134)

Category : Adult care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 14 Oct 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to inform Mr & Mrs X that Mr X’s mother had died. This is because the Council has already upheld the complaint, apologised, and offered a suitable remedy. There is nothing further an investigation by this office could add.

The complaint

  1. The complainants, whom I shall call Mr & Mrs X, complain the Council failed to inform them that Mr X’s mother, Mrs Y, had died. They did not find out until by chance, a month later.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We can decide whether to start or discontinue an investigation into a complaint within our jurisdiction. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 24A(6) and 34B(8), as amended)
  2. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))
  3. We may decide not to start an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions a council has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and by the Council. I also considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X’s mother, Mrs Y, sadly died in April 2021, when she was living in a nursing home. Mr & Mrs X were not told Mrs Y had died and did not find out until a month later, by chance, when the warden contacted them about Mrs Y’s flat, despite the Council having Mr X’s details as next of kin.
  2. This, understandably, caused Mr & Mrs X a great deal of distress. The delay in being informed also meant Mr X was unable to see his mother in the chapel of rest following her death.
  3. Mr & Mrs X complained to the Council. The Council upheld the complaint. It acknowledged fault in its handling of this matter and the distress this caused Mr & Mrs X. It apologised to Mr & Mrs X and offered a payment of £1000 in acknowledgment of the distress it caused.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because whilst this was clearly a very distressing matter for Mr & Mrs X the Council has already, via its complaints procedure, acknowledged fault, apologised and offered a suitable remedy for the distress it caused. There is nothing further an investigation by this office could add to the response already provided by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings