Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council (19 007 312)

Category : Adult care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 12 Oct 2019

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Miss X complained about the Council damaging tiles in her mother’s bathroom when it installed a shower seat. We propose not to investigate this complaint. Claims for damage to property are for the courts to consider, and it is reasonable for Miss X to apply to the court on her mother’s behalf.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complained the Council damaged tiles in her mother’s bathroom when it installed a shower seat.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered the information Miss X provided when she complained, and correspondence between Miss X and the Council’s insurance department.
  2. Miss X had an opportunity to comment on a draft of this decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. The Council agreed to install a shower seat in Miss X’s mother’s (Mrs Y’s) bathroom. It visited Mrs Y and tried to install the seat. However, it was not the correct size. The Council had to visit a second time to fit the correct seat.
  2. Miss X told the Council it had damaged some of the bathroom tiles during these works. The Council replaced the tiles and regrouted the area. Miss X told it there were still some loose tiles and the Council had not left the bathroom in a satisfactory condition.
  3. The Council’s insurance department considered Miss X’s claim, but refused it. Miss X complained to the Ombudsman.
  4. This complaint is a negligence claim. The underlying issue is a matter for the courts. Only a court can decide whether the Council should have dealt with the problem differently to avoid harm to Mrs Y’s property, whether Mrs Y or Miss X should have taken any steps to avoid the harm and whether the Council is liable to pay any damages. The Ombudsman does not have the same power as the courts in this respect, and it is reasonable to expect Miss X to take legal action on Mrs Y’s behalf with her consent.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint. This is because it is a matter for the courts.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings