Curantis Healthcare Limited (23 012 521)

Category : Adult care services > Domiciliary care

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 23 Jan 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr D’s complaint that his late mother’s, Mrs C’s, care provider’s failed to ensure she received her medication as prescribed. This is because we could not make a different finding to that already given to Mr D even if we investigated. We could not now provide Mrs C with a remedy even if we investigated as she is now deceased.

The complaint

  1. Mr D complained his late mother’s, Mrs C’s, home care provider neglected her. Mr D says this resulted in Mrs C having to go back into hospital for a further 17 days where she had to restart her steroid medication. Mr D says this was because her care provider failed to ensure she took her usual and additional steroid medication she had been discharged with from hospital as requiring. Mr D says Mrs C did not recover from this and was discharged to a care home where she subsequently died.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Care Provider responded to Mr D’s complaint. It said Mrs C requested carers transfer her medication from the blister packs into the daily boxes for her to take. It confirmed it did not administer medication to her. It also explained it was not aware of the change in medication and additional steroid medication as it did not have access to her discharge sheet. Mr D says the discharge sheet and additional medication were in Mrs C’s bedroom and easily accessible. The Care Provider said as a result of Mr D’s complaint it will amend its policy to request an email from the hospital for a discharge note as well as the hard copy to minimise the chance of it being displaced.
  2. Further investigation by us could not add to this. We could not draw conclusions that Mrs C would not have needed readmitting back into hospital if she had received the medication. We could not remedy any injustice caused to Mrs C from the Care Provider’s actions even if we investigated and found evidence of fault as she has sadly passed away.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr D’s complaint because we could not add to the Care Provider’s response or make a different finding.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings