Hertfordshire County Council (22 005 386)

Category : Adult care services > COVID-19

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 Jan 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint that a care home delayed in informing him that emergency COVID-19 funding for his mother had stopped and she was now a self-funder. Mr X has agreed to a final settlement on costs so there is no significant unremedied injustice for the Ombudsman to investigate.

The complaint

  1. Mr X’s complaint that a care home delayed in informing him that emergency COVID-19 funding for his mother had stopped and she was now a self-funder.
  2. Mr X said the resulting bill for outstanding fees, as well as way the family was informed of the bill, caused him and the family shock and distress.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide further investigation would not lead to a different outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X’s mother, Mrs M, went into residential care during the ‘discharge to assess’ arrangements during the COVID-19 pandemic. Whilst these arrangements were in place, people did not have to pay for their care.
  2. The arrangements stopped but it took around six months for the family to be informed. By this point, the outstanding fees had accrued to around £30,000.
  3. Since these events took place, Mr X has agreed a settlement over the care home fees and so there is no significant unremedied injustice for the Ombudsman to investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is no significant unremedied injustice.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings