Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council (25 019 220)

Category : Adult care services > Charging

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 30 Apr 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with Ms X’s financial assessment. The Council has upheld the complaint and agreed to remedy Ms X’s injustice by apologising and waiving care fees incurred during its delay. Further investigation by us would therefore not be proportionate.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains the Council did not progress her financial assessment for five months. It did not provide any information during the delay causing confusion. It then sent a backdated invoice for fees Ms X did not know were accruing and could not then afford to pay as a lump sum.
  2. Ms X is seeking a waiver of the fees that accrued before the Council told her she was required to contribute to her care costs.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X completed a financial assessment application in April 2025. She did not hear anything from the Council and assumed she was not required to make any payment toward her care costs, as this had been the case before April 2025.
  2. In September 2025, the Council sent a bill backdated to April 2025 for Ms X to pay toward her care costs since then.
  3. Ms X complained the Council had not told her she would need to pay toward her care before this time and that the information provided by the Council was confusing.
  4. In response to her complaint the Council accepted there was fault in the way it had dealt with the matter, and apologised. It explained the costs and agreed to waive all care costs from before September 2025.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because the Council has accepted fault and agreed to provide a proportionate remedy during its investigation. A further investigation by the Ombudsman is not therefore justified.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings