Wiltshire Council (25 005 677)

Category : Adult care services > Charging

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 09 Oct 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about an error in the Council’s bill for Mr X’s father’s care fees. This is because the Council has accepted its error, provided an explanation and apologised under its own complaints procedure. We would not achieve more than this if we were to investigate.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council sent an incorrect bill for his father’s care fees. Mr X says the first bill was for the wrong person, and then the Council sent a bill for an incorrect sum. He says the Council caused him avoidable stress and worry at a time when he was grieving for his father.
  2. Mr X is seeking compensation from the Council.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome, or
  • there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X notified the Council his father had passed away in early 2025.
  2. The Council sent a final bill for care fees. The bill was not for Mr X’s late father. He complained to the Council, and the Council issued a further bill.
  3. The new bill was for a higher sum than Mr X expected, and he queried this with the Council.
  4. Following communication back and forth between Mr X and the Council, the Council accepted there was an error. It explained the reason for the mistake and apologised.
  5. The apology provided is an appropriate remedy in this matter.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because the Council has already provided a suitable remedy.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings