North Somerset Council (25 004 456)

Category : Adult care services > Charging

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 28 Aug 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of a charge for residential care. This is because the injustice is not significant enough to warrant our involvement, and an investigation is unlikely to lead to a different outcome.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains that the Council sent a bill for residential care for his wife’s uncle, Mr B four years after his death, when they believed all charges had been paid. He says this caused distress and frustration.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B)).

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council. I also considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr B was living in residential care arranged by the Council when he died in 2021. Mrs X, Mr B’s niece paid the care charges in 2023. However, the Council sent Mr and Mrs X a further bill in 2025. They were distressed as another close relative had recently died.
  2. The Council responded to Mr and Mrs X’s complaint apologising for the delay in sending the care bill. They said the Council had now written off the charge.
  3. The Council has taken appropriate action and apologised. There is no remaining significant injustice here that warrants investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because the injustice is not significant enough to warrant our involvement and an investigation is unlikely to lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings