Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council (25 001 998)

Category : Adult care services > Charging

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 21 Jul 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about matters relating to the Council seeking payment of her father’s care home fees following his death. This is because the Council has already taken suitable action to remedy the matters raised in the complaint, prior to our involvement.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complained about the Council seeking payment of her father’s care home fees following his death. She also complained the Council was not responding to her stage two complaint in a timely manner.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions an organisation has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)
  3. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X complained the Council was delaying in responding to her stage 2 complaint about it seeking payment of her father’s care home fees following his death.
  2. The Council provided its final response to Miss X’s complaint after Miss X had submitted her complaint to us, but before we started to assess it.
  3. In its final response, the Council acknowledged significant delay in relation to Miss X’s father’s financial assessment and that it did not provide clear information about the process to the family. It apologised for the confusion this caused and removed all outstanding care charges. It also offered both Miss X and her sister a £150 time and trouble payment and apologised for the distress caused to Miss X by her interaction with a Council officer on the matter.
  4. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint. This is because the Council has already taken suitable action to resolve the matter prior to our involvement and there is nothing further we would add or recommend were we to also investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because the Council has already taken suitable action to resolve the matter

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings