Ideal Carehomes (Number One) Limited (24 010 495)

Category : Adult care services > Charging

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 18 Dec 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Care Provider’s handling of her mother’s care home fees because it has apologised and resolved the issue. Further investigation by us would therefore not be proportionate.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains the Care Provider delayed taking payment for care home fees from her mother, Mrs Y and invoiced Mrs Y in error. Mrs X notes the first issue was resolved but she is concerned the invoicing error could be a systemic fault affecting others. She also seeks compensation for distress.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about adult social care providers. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe:
  • the injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or
  • it is unlikely further investigation will lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, sections 34B(8) and (9))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Care Provider.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X accepts the Care Provider took action to resolve its delay in invoicing her mother and apologised. I consider this to be a suitable remedy and further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.
  2. The Care Provider invoiced Mrs Y for a client contribution in error. It explained this happened because some residents paid it directly and others through the council. It apologised and resolved the issue. I consider this to be suitable remedy and further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.
  3. We do not award compensation in the same way as the courts. While we can consider symbolic payments for distress, any injustice suffered by Mrs X is not significant enough to warrant a further remedy.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because further investigation is unlikely to lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings