Cornwall Council (23 018 254)

Category : Adult care services > Charging

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 25 Mar 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs B’s complaint about the Council charging the late Mrs C for care. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault with the actions taken by the Council to warrant an ombudsman investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mrs B complained in her role as executor of the late Mrs C’s estate. Mrs B says she is concerned about incomplete financial assessments, unsigned contracts, and the Council’s failure to set up a direct debit so care fees could be paid monthly. Mrs B says the Council should acknowledge the faults and reduce or cancel Mrs C’s care fees.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome, or
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants.
  • there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council explained Mrs C who had capacity at the time, agreed to residential care, it sent information about setting up a direct debit but did not receive a response and Mrs C’s contribution towards her care was assessed on her bank statements and DWP benefit income. It explained how it calculated the amount Mrs C owed and the outstanding balance of £8, 008.74. The Council has explained how the debt arose and investigation by the Ombudsman would not change this.
  2. The Council has provided a statement of what the outstanding balance comprises of and informed Mrs B as the executor of Mrs C’s estate about the outstanding debt at the date she died.
  3. It is the responsibility of the executor to collect the assets, pay any debts and use the resulting balance to distribute to any beneficiaries.
  4. If the executor disputes the existence of a particular debt they can refuse to pay and defend any court proceedings against them.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs B’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault with the actions taken by the Council to warrant an ombudsman investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings