Kent County Council (23 006 903)

Category : Adult care services > Charging

Decision : Not upheld

Decision date : 29 Nov 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mrs X complained the Council failed to consider disability related expenditures when carrying out a financial assessment for her son and delayed completing the assessment. We are discontinuing our investigation into Mrs X complaint as we cannot say that Ms X is a suitable representative.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained the Council failed to consider disability related expenditures when carrying out a financial assessment for her son, Mr Y, and delayed completing the assessment.
  2. She says this has resulted in Mr Y being asked to pay a greater contribution than he should.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We may investigate complaints made on behalf of someone else if they have given their consent. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26A(1), as amended)
  2. It is our decision whether to start, and when to end an investigation into something the law allows us to investigate. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 24A(6) and 34B(8), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered:
    • The information provided by Mrs X and discussed the complaint with her;
    • The Council’s comments on the complaint; and
    • Relevant law and guidance.
  2. Mrs X and the organisation had an opportunity to comment on my draft decision. I considered any comments received before making a final decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mrs X complains on behalf of Mr Y that the Council failed to consider his disability related expenditures when carrying out the financial assessment. She says she has not paid the contribution determined by the Council as Mr Y is being asked to pay more than is necessary.
  2. The Council has concerns about Mrs X being Mr Y’s deputy. It says there is a large debt in Mr Y’s name because of these actions. Further it says it has begun an investigation into this matter which may result in Mrs X being removed as Mr Y’s deputy. This goes to the heart of the complaint made to us. We take no position on these allegations but, at this time, we cannot say that Mrs X is a suitable representative to make this complaint on behalf of Mr Y.
  3. Should, following the investigation, Mrs X remain Mr Y’s deputy she can bring the complaint back to us for investigation. If she is removed as deputy the decision to continue this complaint will be for his new deputy (or another suitable representative) to decide.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I am discontinuing my investigation as we cannot say Mrs X is a suitable representative.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings