Barchester Healthcare Homes Limited (22 015 847)

Category : Adult care services > Charging

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 14 Mar 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about an increase in adult social care fees because there is no injustice given the Care Provider reduced the increase to the minimum contractual amount. We could not add to the Care Provider’s own investigation nor reach a different outcome.

The complaint

  1. Mr B disputes the reasons the Care Provider gave to justify a fee increase above the standard amount.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about adult social care providers. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe:
  • the action has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
  • the injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or
  • it is unlikely we could add to any previous investigation by the care provider, or
  • it is unlikely further investigation will lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, sections 34B(8) and (9))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr B’s father (Mr C) lived at a care home run by Barchester Healthcare Homes Limited (the Care Provider).
  2. Mr C’s contract allows the Care Provider to increase its fees in April each year by 5.9%, and by more than this where government interventions lead to significant and demonstrable increases in the business’s costs or taxes. In 2022 the Care Provider increased its fees by more than the 5.9%. Mr B disputes the reasons the Care Provider gives to justify this.
  3. In response to Mr B’s complaint the Care Provider said because of failures in its complaint handling it would only increase Mr C’s care fees by 5.9% from April 2022, and it apologised to Mr B.
  4. This leaves no outstanding injustice to warrant any investigation by the Ombudsman.
  5. Mr C has died and there is no ongoing liability for care fees.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint because there is insufficient injustice to warrant an investigation, we could not add to the Care Provider’s investigation, or reach a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings