West Sussex County Council (21 015 660)

Category : Adult care services > Charging

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 07 Mar 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint that the Council charged the complainant for care while she was in hospital. This is because there is no evidence off fault.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I will call Mrs X, complains about charges she received for care while she was in hospital. She says she was not made aware that she would be eligible for charges when in hospital and wants the charges cancelled.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X pays a contribution towards her care. She complains that she has been charged for the contribution for a period when she was in hospital. She says she was not made aware of this.
  2. Council’s policy states that care contributions will need to be paid even if the service is not used for a period, of example if someone is in hospital. This policy is included on the Council’s website and on leaflets sent to those paying for their care.
  3. I will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council. The Council’s policy is clear and it has provided case notes that show that care fees were discussed and that a leaflet detailing the arrangements was sent to Mrs X, a subsequent assessment recorded that Mrs X had confirmed she had received the leaflet. I am therefore satisfied that the Council properly communicated its policy to Mrs X and therefore cannot question its decision not to refund the charges for when she was in hospital.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings