North Yorkshire County Council (21 014 542)

Category : Adult care services > Charging

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 07 Feb 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs B’s complaint about the delay in receiving an overpayment for her late mother’s, Mrs C’s, care charges. This is because the Council has refunded the monies owed to the estate and there is no unremedied injustice warranting an Ombudsman investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mrs B complained the Council sent an invoice for care after her late mother, Mrs C, had passed away, and she did not receive the refund of the overpayment for five months. Mrs B says she wants the Council to address all the points in her initial complaint to ensure mistakes do not happen again.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council responded to Mrs B’s complaint in October. It said it was not notified that Mrs C had passed away until 22 September which is why she had received a further invoice for her care charges. It apologised and advised Mrs C’s account had been put on hold. It said Mrs B would be informed when the account had been recalculated.
  2. The Council confirmed it had repaid Mrs C’s estate the overpayment of care charges £599.34 on 5 January 2022.
  3. While Mrs B has not had all the answers she wants it is not the role of the Ombudsman to provide these. Although there was a delay in the estate receiving the refund, we are satisfied the Council has now repaid the overpayment, apologised to Mrs B for the distress caused from receiving a further invoice and explained the reasons for this.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs B’s complaint because there is no unremedied injustice warranting an Ombudsman investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings