Surrey County Council (21 005 788)

Category : Adult care services > Charging

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 13 Sep 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about how the Council handled an application for a deputyship because it is about the start of court action. The complaint is also late and there are no good reasons to consider it now. And Mr Z had the opportunity to take part in the court proceedings so it would also have been reasonable to expect him to raise his concerns in court.

The complaint

  1. Mr Z says the Council failed to consult him and his family before applying to the Court of Protection for a deputyship order for his aunt in 2019.
  2. Mr Z also says the Council charged his aunt for making an unnecessary application.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended)
  3. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
  4. We have the power to start or discontinue an investigation into a complaint within our jurisdiction. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we think the issues could reasonably be, or have been, raised within a court of law. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 24A(6) and 34B(8), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr Z and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr Z says the application for the deputyship was inappropriate, disproportionate, and unnecessary. Therefore, he would like a refund of the application fees charged by the Council.
  2. Mr Z says he received notice of the application from the Office of the Public Guardian in July 2019.
  3. The action Mr Z complains of is the start of court action and we cannot investigate it.
  4. Mr Z knew about the matter in July 2019, so even if we could investigate parts of it, the complaint is late. There is no reason Mr Z could not have come to us sooner so there are no good reasons to exercise our discretion and consider the complaint now.
  5. In any event, even if the complaint was not late Mr Z knew about the court application and could have challenged the Council’s actions and the fees associated with this application in court.

Back to top

Final decision

We cannot investigate Mr Z’s complaint because it is about the start of court action. It would have been reasonable for Mr Z to have challenged the Council’s actions in court because he had the opportunity to do so.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings