London Borough of Harrow (25 024 420)

Category : Adult care services > Assessment and care plan

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 Mar 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about a delay in the provision of specialist equipment. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains about delay in the provision of a rise and recline chair recommended by an Occupational Therapist. She also complains about delay in the Disabled Facilities Grant process.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council carried out an Occupational Therapy Assessment in July 2025. It recommended a rise recliner chair for Mrs X.
  2. In August, Mrs X said she did not want the chair. The Council arranged a visit in September with a specialist to ensure the new chair would meet her needs. Mrs X cancelled the visit and the Council arranged another visit later that month. In November, it ordered the chair. On the delivery date, Mrs X cancelled the order. In December, Mrs X asked for the chair again and in January she complained to us.
  3. During the Occupational Therapy Assessment, Mrs X explained she could not go upstairs. She asked for a stairlift and a profiling bed. She said she was having an operation on her feet. The Council told her it would re-assess her after the operation.
  4. Mrs X said she needed help with the Disabled Facilities Grants form. In October, the Council told her the Occupational Therapist could help with this, but Mrs X cancelled the visit. In December, the Council told Mrs X it would visit her to help with the forms.
  5. I will not investigate this complaint. The Council has assessed Mrs X and arranged to provide the equipment she needs. It has offered to help her complete forms to access further equipment. There is not enough evidence of fault in the information I have seen to justify an investigation by the Ombudsman.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings