London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham (25 005 175)

Category : Adult care services > Assessment and care plan

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 28 Sep 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about Mrs Y’s case being taken to the Court of Protection for a decision about her mental capacity and best interests. The law prevents us investigating matters that are being considered in court.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complained the Council began court action when she asked for her mother (Mrs Y) to be moved closer to her. She also complained the social worker was rude, condescending and lacking in compassion, and refused to engage with her.
  2. Ms X said the matter had caused her significant distress, and said she wanted the Council to consult her on the matter.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The law prevents us investigating complaints about a council’s decision to begin court proceedings. In this case, the court of protection application has been made by a professional Relevant Person’s Representative, appointed to support Mrs Y with matters relating to her Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards authorisation. We have no power to investigate this decision.
  2. We could not investigate the Council’s actions in relation to the proceedings. This includes the content of its representations to court about Mrs Y’s capacity and best interests, and what steps it did or did not take in gathering information and forming its view. Ms X’s complaints about the social worker’s approach are inextricably linked to the matter being considered by the court.
  3. In any event, we could not come to sound conclusions about Ms X’s perception of the social worker’s attitude during verbal conversations and it would not be proportionate to investigate a complaint about their alleged lack of response to emails in isolation, even if separable to the court proceedings.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because it is about matters being considered in ongoing court proceedings, and peripheral matters that are too intertwined with those proceedings.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings