Cheshire West & Chester Council (24 018 786)

Category : Adult care services > Assessment and care plan

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 10 Apr 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about funding for an adult social care respite stay in a residential care home. The complaint is a late complaint as the complainant knew about the matters two years ago. There are no good reasons the complaint could not have been made to us sooner.

The complaint

  1. Mr B says the Council refuses to pay an invoice for a respite stay at a residential care home for his relative, Ms C. Mr B says had the Council assessed Ms C sooner then it would have been responsible to fund the respite stay so wants it to do so.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms C’s respite stay happened in January 2023. Mr B knew of the Council’s decision to only accept responsibility for Ms C’s needs from the date of its assessment in January 2023.
  2. Mr B approached the Ombudsman in January 2025, two years after he knew about the issues he complains about. Mr B has given no good reasons why he could not complain sooner, and why he could not complain by January 2024. I recognise Ms C died within this period and so that will likely have impacted Mr B’s ability to progress matters. But the complaint was made to the Ombudsman over a year since Ms C died.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint because this is a late complaint with no good reasons why the complaint could not have been made to the Ombudsman within twelve months of Mr B’s knowledge of the events.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings