Warrington Council (23 001 101)

Category : Adult care services > Assessment and care plan

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 30 May 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Council decision-making related to Mr Y’s care and support. This is because we do not consider Mr X to be a suitable representative.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council is not acting in his relative, Mr Y’s, best interests by considering a plan to enable Mr Y to return home from a care home. Mr X says Mr Y would be at unsafe and isolated if he returned home, his care needs could not be met and it would be detrimental to his mental health. He wants Mr Y to remain living in the care home.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We may investigate a complaint on behalf of someone who has died or who cannot authorise someone to act for them. The complaint may be made by:
  • their personal representative (if they have one), or
  • someone we consider to be suitable.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 26A(2), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr Y has health conditions and does not have capacity to decide where he should live. He currently lives in a care home, but Mr X is unhappy with the Council’s decision that it is in Mr Y’s best interests to return home with a package of care in place to meet his care needs.
  2. Mr X is not a suitable representative to bring a complaint on Mr Y’s behalf. I have reached this decision because:
    • Mr X does not have power of attorney for Mr Y and is not a blood relative.
    • Mr Y has an advocate appointed under the Mental Capacity Act 2005, to represent his views during the best interest decision making process.
    • The decision reached at the best interest meeting was that, if Mr Y’s needs could safely be met, then he should return home. The Council invited Mr X to the best interest meeting to share his views and participate in the decision making, but Mr X chose not to attend. This raises concerns about whether Mr X is suitable to act in Mr Y’s best interest.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because we do not consider him to be a suitable representative to bring a complaint on Mr Y’s behalf.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings