Worcestershire County Council (22 006 582)

Category : Adult care services > Assessment and care plan

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 07 Sep 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council requesting documentation Mrs C’s representatives say does not exist. This is because we cannot interpret law and it would be reasonable for Mrs C’s representatives to challenge the Council’s decision to include her property in her financial assessment in a court.

The complaint

  1. Mrs C’s representatives complain they have provided the Council with all the Trust documents they have, a valuation of Mrs C’s property and a completed TR1 form and do not have a deed of Trust the Council has requested. Mrs C’s representatives say the Council has wrongly included her property in the financial assessment and in accordance with the Trust, it should be disregarded.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word fault to refer to these. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in the decision making, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The dispute arises because the Council has requested documentation Mrs C’s representatives say does not exist. It is not open for us to question the Council’s decision to request documentation or question that the Trust exists without deeds as Mrs C’s representatives have advised. The complexities of Trust Law, Mrs C’s property, the creation of the discretionary Trust and its application, are only for a court to interpret.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs C’s complaint because it would be reasonable for her representatives to ask the court to consider whether the Council’s decision to charge Mrs C for her care based on information it has about the Trust has been interpreted wrongly.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings