Leicester City Council (21 016 773)

Category : Adult care services > Assessment and care plan

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 21 Aug 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council failing to implement the recommendations we made following a previous investigation, and that the financial assessment is wrong. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council failed to implement the recommendations made by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman. He complains the financial assessment completed by the Council is wrong.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We previously investigated a complaint by Mr X and in a final decision statement in September 2021, we made some recommendations for the Council to complete.
  2. We reviewed the Council’s compliance with our recommendations and was satisfied the Council had completed the recommendations in January 2022.
  3. Mr X has made a new complaint as he is unhappy with the Council’s review and financial assessment. He complains the Council has not allowed all the disability related expenditure (DRE) he asked for. He also considers he should not have to pay anything towards the cost of his care and support.
  4. The Council has provided Mr X with a detailed explanation for how it considered the requested DRE. The Council has used its discretion to allow for some of the requested DRE and provided reasons for why it has not agreed to the others.
  5. Further, the Council has explained its consideration of the other matters we asked it to consider and provided its reasons for its decisions.
  6. Therefore, I will not investigate this complaint as there is insufficient evidence of fault to justify an investigation. This is because the Council has shown proper consideration of the matters we asked it to review, and it is entitled to make its decision.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings