Kent County Council (21 015 909)

Category : Adult care services > Assessment and care plan

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 03 Mar 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to properly consider Mrs B’s late aunt’s, Mrs C’s, finances. This is because there is no unremedied injustice warranting an Ombudsman investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mrs B complained the Council should have applied a £5.75 savings disregard to her late aunts, Mrs C’s, financial assessment. Mrs B says although the Council has now agreed to do this she is concerned other service users may experience the same difficulties she has encountered because of the way the Council are undertaking financial assessments.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs B says the Council has now agreed to reassess Mrs C’s finances and says it will include the £5.75 savings disregard in the assessment. We are satisfied this remedies the injustice caused to Mrs C’s estate. If the Council does not complete the agreed reassessment as advised, Mrs C’s Executor can pursue this with the Council.
  2. Mrs B is concerned the Council may be wrongly assessing finances and failing to apply proper disregards for others in its area. The regulations and statutory guidance set out what the Council should include in its financial assessments. The Council has accepted there was an error in this case but there is no evidence of a systemic failure in the way the Council carries out its financial assessment warranting an Ombudsman investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs B’s complaint because the Council has agreed to complete a reassessment of Mrs C’s finances. We are satisfied the injustice caused to Mrs C’s estate is now remedied.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings