Decision search


What's this ?
  • Organisation
  • Decision type

  • Reference number
  • Date range

     

  • Sort Results

Show advanced search

Your search has 56922 results

  • West Midlands Combined Authority (25 014 172)

    Statement Upheld Public transport 09-Apr-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about public transport because we are satisfied with the actions proposed by the Authority.

  • Nottinghamshire County Council (25 016 820)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 09-Apr-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Council’s involvement with her children. There is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s action to justify us investigating. It would also be reasonable for Miss X to raise any concerns she has about the care and contact arrangements for her children in court.

  • London Borough of Wandsworth (25 016 991)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 09-Apr-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about business improvement district levy recovery action as it is unlikely we will find fault causing injustice to the complainant and part of the complaint is made late and there are not good reasons to investigate now.

  • Cheshire West & Chester Council (25 017 276)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 09-Apr-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint that the Council’s actions have alienated the complainant’s children from him. This is because our intervention would not achieve what he is seeking or lead to a different outcome.

  • Buckinghamshire Council (25 017 449)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 09-Apr-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the actions of Enforcement Agents acting on behalf of the Council, to recover a debt for an unpaid Penalty Charge Notice. This is because it is late and there are no reasons the complaint could not have been made sooner. It is also unlikely that further investigation would find evidence of fault.

  • Hertfordshire County Council (25 017 578)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries School transport 09-Apr-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council failing to act on multiple safeguarding concerns Ms X had about unsafe special educational needs transport practices. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council.

  • West Sussex County Council (25 017 739)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Alternative provision 09-Apr-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s refusal to provide alternative educational provision for Ms X’s son while he was unable to attend school. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to warrant investigation.

  • Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council (25 017 948)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 09-Apr-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to sell a sports stadium. Mr X has not claimed a significant personal injustice and there is not enough evidence the Council’s decision is likely to cause him any, so an investigation is not warranted.

  • Gloucestershire County Council (25 018 163)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Special educational needs 09-Apr-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of her child’s education, health and care plan because an investigation would not lead to a different outcome. It was reasonable for Mrs X to use her right of appeal if she was unhappy with the content of the final plan the Council issued.

  • Leicester City Council (25 018 251)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 09-Apr-2026

    Summary: Mr X complains he is not liable for the debt on a business rates account. We will not investigate this complaint because it is reasonable to have expected Mr X to have attended Court to dispute the Liability Order. The Court would have been better placed to make this decision.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings