Local Government Ombudsman Logo

www.lgo.org.uk has experienced a problem

The website has encountered an error. The issue has been logged so that we can investigate the cause.

You can visit the home page and try browsing again. Please accept our apologies for any inconvenience caused.

You may still be able to use our online complaint service if you want to register a complaint or log into your account.

SearchResult - Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman

Decision search

What's this ?
  • Organisation
  • Decision type

  • Reference number
  • Date range

     

  • Sort Results

Show advanced search

Your search has 55054 results

  • Sheffield City Council (25 001 491)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 06-Jul-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the way the Council dealt with the complainant’s planning applications. This is because the complainant has appealed to the Planning Inspectorate which acts on behalf of the relevant Government minister. We have no jurisdiction to investigate in these circumstances.

  • Buckinghamshire Council (25 001 492)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Refuse and recycling 06-Jul-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s refuse crew giving false information in response to a report about a missed garden waste collection. We do not consider the complainant has suffered a significant personal injustice which warrants an investigation.

  • Birmingham City Council (25 001 601)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 06-Jul-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a dropped kerb application because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigation.

  • Birmingham City Council (25 001 864)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Allocations 06-Jul-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about an unsuccessful application to join the housing register. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

  • Bristol City Council (25 002 921)

    Statement Upheld Alternative provision 04-Jul-2025

    Summary: Miss X complains the Council has delayed implementing the recommendations of a previous Ombudsman’s investigation. The Council delayed implementing recommendations of a previous Ombudsman investigation. Miss X suffered delay and uncertainty. The Council says it will pay Miss X a further £250, provide guidance to staff and review its processes. This is an appropriate remedy.

  • Torbay Council (25 000 846)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Alternative provision 04-Jul-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to cease home tuition for the complainant’s son. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault on the Council’s part to warrant our intervention.

  • Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council (25 000 935)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Disabled children 04-Jul-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to refuse Miss X’s application for a Blue Badge for her son. There is insufficient evidence of fault on the Council’s part to warrant our intervention.

  • London Borough of Wandsworth (25 005 177)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 03-Jul-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a planning application. This is because we are unlikely to find fault.

  • Liverpool City Council (25 005 528)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 03-Jul-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about an import inspection delay. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to warrant our investigation.

  • Worcester City Council (25 006 584)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 03-Jul-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Miss B’s complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) for an alleged parking contravention. This is because it is reasonable for Miss B to put in an appeal to the Traffic Penalty Tribunal.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings