Decision search


What's this ?
  • Organisation
  • Decision type

  • Reference number
  • Date range

     

  • Sort Results

Show advanced search

Your search has 56552 results

  • London Borough of Tower Hamlets (25 029 800)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 26-Mar-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate how the Council dealt with Mrs X’s complaint about its handling of penalty charge notices it had issued to her. This is because Mrs X’s complaint is made late to us and there are not good reasons to investigate now.

  • Nottinghamshire County Council (25 030 353)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Highway repair and maintenance 26-Mar-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate Miss B’s complaint that her vehicle was damaged by a large pothole. This is because it is reasonable for Miss B to take the Council to court.

  • Leicestershire County Council (24 014 855)

    Statement Upheld Assessment and care plan 25-Mar-2026

    Summary: Mrs X complained about the actions of Leicestershire County Council (the Council), Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust (the Trust) and HC-One Ltd (the Provider). She complained about faults in the way her late brother Mr Z was discharged from hospital, in his residential care and in the handling of concerns, safeguarding and complaints. We upheld elements of all three complaints. We recommended the organisations apologise and provide remedies to Mrs X. We also recommended service improvements. The organisations accepted our recommendations, so we have completed our investigation.

  • Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust (24 014 855a)

    Statement Upheld Community hospital services 25-Mar-2026

    Summary: Mrs X complained about the actions of Leicestershire County Council (the Council), Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust (the Trust) and HC-One Ltd (the Provider). She complained about faults in the way her late brother Mr Z was discharged from hospital, in his residential care and in the handling of concerns, safeguarding and complaints. We upheld elements of all three complaints. We recommended the organisations apologise and provide remedies to Mrs X. We also recommended service improvements. The organisations accepted our recommendations, so we have completed our investigation.

  • HC-One Ltd (24 014 855b)

    Statement Upheld Community hospital services 25-Mar-2026

    Summary: Mrs X complained about the actions of Leicestershire County Council (the Council), Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust (the Trust) and HC-One Ltd (the Provider). She complained about faults in the way her late brother Mr Z was discharged from hospital, in his residential care and in the handling of concerns, safeguarding and complaints. We upheld elements of all three complaints. We recommended the organisations apologise and provide remedies to Mrs X. We also recommended service improvements. The organisations accepted our recommendations, so we have completed our investigation.

  • Surrey County Council (24 023 478)

    Statement Upheld Special educational needs 25-Mar-2026

    Summary: The complaint is about how the Council responded to a complaint, about Mrs E’s son’s Education, Health and Care Plan. The Council did not arrange occupational therapy that was in the Plan, the complaint responses were inadequate and the Council did not provide the remedies it said it would. We uphold the complaint. The Council delayed providing the therapy sessions, did not issue a decision following a review and did not ensure the child received as much educational provision as he was able to after he stopped attending school. The Council’s complaint responses were also inadequate. This caused distress to Mrs E and her son likely missed educational provision. The Council has agreed to apologise and make symbolic payments as a remedy.

  • Westminster City Council (25 000 467)

    Statement Upheld Allocations 25-Mar-2026

    Summary: There was fault by the Council in how it handled Mrs K’s housing and homelessness applications and how it communicated with Mr X, who was acting on her behalf. The Council’s shortcomings caused them both distress, uncertainty, confusion, and frustration. The Council will apologise to Mrs K and Mr X and make symbolic payments to them both.

  • Avery Homes (Nelson) Limited (25 000 857)

    Statement Upheld Residential care 25-Mar-2026

    Summary: Ms X complained about the standard of care provided to her late relative, Mrs Y, by the Care Provider where she lived. We found the actions of the Care Provider caused avoidable injustice to both Mrs Y and Ms X. To remedy this injustice, the Care Provider has agreed to apologise to Ms X.

  • Warwickshire County Council (25 001 682)

    Statement Not upheld Assessment and care plan 25-Mar-2026

    Summary: Mr F complained the Council failed to properly assess his care and support needs under the Care Act 2014. We found no fault.

  • London Borough of Croydon (25 002 070)

    Statement Upheld Homelessness 25-Mar-2026

    Summary: Mrs D complains about the handling of her homelessness application. I have found some fault by the Council including a failure to include medical needs information in the personalised housing plan. The Council has agreed to apologise to Mrs D and pay redress for avoidable time and trouble caused by delays and errors.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings