Decision search
Your search has 55558 results
-
Surrey County Council (25 013 790)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 05-Feb-2026
Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about ongoing delays investigating her complaint about failures to protect her from abuse as a child. The Council is currently completing an independent review of Ms X’s records. It is unlikely an investigation would lead to a different outcome.
-
Wakefield Metropolitan District Council (25 013 943)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 05-Feb-2026
Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council failing to notify her of her neighbour’s application for a Certificate of Lawful Development. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation by the Ombudsman.
-
Wokingham Borough Council (25 014 006)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Highway repair and maintenance 05-Feb-2026
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about how the Council responded to his enquiries about a local development. This is because any injustice is not significant enough to warrant an investigation by the Ombudsman.
-
London Borough of Brent (25 014 522)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Council tax 05-Feb-2026
Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about council tax summonses and the Council’s recovery action. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault and we cannot investigate the summonses and liability order hearings.
-
Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council (25 014 696)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 05-Feb-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about road markings outside Mrs X’s home. The claimed injustice is not significant enough to warrant our involvement.
-
Transport for London (25 014 762)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 05-Feb-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a penalty charge notice Mr X complains was wrongly served. This is because he had right of appeal to London Tribunals; it would have been reasonable for him to use it.
-
Southend-on-Sea City Council (25 015 380)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 05-Feb-2026
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of enforcement action because there is insufficient evidence of fault causing sufficient injustice to justify our involvement.
-
Stoke-on-Trent City Council (25 015 627)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Leisure and culture 05-Feb-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to provide reasonable adjustments for Mr X because the complaint is late. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about being evicted from an allotment. This is because an investigation would be unlikely to find fault with the Council’s actions.
-
London Borough of Harrow (25 015 774)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 05-Feb-2026
Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice because Mr Y has already appealed the matter to the Tribunal and it is not a good use of public resources to investigate how the Council dealt with a complaint where we cannot investigate the substantive issue.
-
Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames (25 015 961)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Allocations 05-Feb-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to remove Mr X from its housing register as it is made late and there are not good reasons to investigate now. It is unlikely we will find fault in the Council’s decision not to conduct a late review of this decision and so we will not investigate this aspect of the complaint.