Decision search
Your search has 57541 results
-
London Borough of Lewisham (25 030 302)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 21-May-2026
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the conduct of Civil Enforcement Agents this is because there is a better body placed to investigate. Additionally we cannot achieve the outcome Mr X wants.
-
East Suffolk Council (25 031 222)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 21-May-2026
Summary: We will not investigate the Council’s refusal to consider Ms X’s concerns about a Prohibition Order. This is because it was reasonable to expect Ms X to appeal to a Tribunal against the issuing of the Order. It is not proportionate to investigate the complaint handling in isolation. Further, Ms X can raise her concerns about the Council’s alleged failure to provide information, to the Information Commissioner as it is better placed to consider.
-
London Borough of Havering (25 031 576)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 21-May-2026
Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to comply with a penalty charge notice appeal decision by London Tribunals. This is because Mr X applied to the Traffic Enforcement Centre at Northampton County Court to challenge the Council’s escalation of the case and we cannot consider a complaint about the same issue now.
-
Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames (26 001 230)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 21-May-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the enforcement of Penalty Charge Notices. It is reasonable to expect Ms X to apply to the Traffic Enforcement Centre to seek to regain her appeal rights, and then to appeal to a tribunal if the Traffic Enforcement Centre agrees.
-
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Special educational needs 21-May-2026
Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to ensure a suitable education was secured because the Complainant has used her right to appeal to the First-Tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability). The law prevents us from investigating this complaint because the matters complained of are linked to the appeal.
-
London Borough of Lewisham (25 020 703)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Special educational needs 21-May-2026
Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about the content of an Education, Health and Care Plan and the lack of provision secured by the Council because it was reasonable for the complainant to use her right to appeal to the First-Tier (Special Educational Needs and Disability) Tribunal.
-
Milton Keynes Council (25 020 947)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 21-May-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council considered Mr X’s report of illegal business practices. Further investigation would not lead to a different outcome, and no worthwhile outcome is achievable by our involvement.
-
Preston City Council (25 021 169)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Councillor conduct and standards 21-May-2026
Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council’s decision to enter into a friendship agreement with another town, its handling of her complaint and its response to her Freedom of Information request. There is insufficient evidence of fault and the Information Commissioner’s Office is better placed to consider a complaint about access to information.
-
London Borough of Ealing (25 021 357)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Transport 21-May-2026
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s consideration of his wife’s blue badge application. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council to warrant an investigation.
-
Eastleigh Borough Council (25 021 434)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Allocations 21-May-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to amend its original decision on Mr X’s relative’s application to join the Housing Register. This is because there is no evidence of a significant injustice.