Disabled facilities grants archive 2023-2024


Archive has 80 results

  • West Berkshire Council (23 010 074)

    Statement Upheld Disabled facilities grants 28-Mar-2024

    Summary: Miss X complained about the quality of work carried out under a disabled facilities grant which she says has left her without adequate shower facilities. There was no fault in the way the Council has responded to the concerns Miss X raised about the quality of the works. However, the Council commissioned contractor failed to update the construction phase health and safety plan to include that food should not be consumed on the premises. This was fault. The Council has agreed to apologise and pay Ms X £200 to acknowledge the uncertainty this caused Miss X over whether an allergic reaction she had could have been avoided.

  • London Borough of Tower Hamlets (23 018 118)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Disabled facilities grants 27-Mar-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about delay in the Council agreeing to fund the adaptations his mother needed. He also complains there has been a delay in the works being completed. This because there is insufficient evidence of fault. In addition, one element of the complaint is premature as Mr X has not made the complaint to the Council.

  • Gloucester City Council (23 018 172)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Disabled facilities grants 27-Mar-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of a disabled facilities grant application for her child. She says the Council has been vague about what is covered by the grant. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault.

  • City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council (23 017 052)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Disabled facilities grants 26-Mar-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the standard of property works funded by the Council under two sets of DFGs in 2018 and 2021. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault to warrant investigating the more recent works funded by the Council. We cannot achieve the outcome Mr X wants in respect of works completed in 2018 given the passage of time.

  • City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council (23 015 301)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Disabled facilities grants 25-Mar-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about an alleged failure by the Council to meet social care needs or appropriately safeguard the complainant from the risk of harm. This is because we are unlikely to find fault with the Council’s handling of these matters.

  • Manchester City Council (23 004 542)

    Statement Upheld Disabled facilities grants 20-Mar-2024

    Summary: Ms B complains about the Council’s response to her request for a stairlift. We have identified fault in terms of delay in progressing the application and poor communication. We have not found fault in the way the Council decided to change the scope of the works.

  • Bury Metropolitan Borough Council (23 008 623)

    Statement Upheld Disabled facilities grants 18-Mar-2024

    Summary: Miss Y complained the Council wrongly cancelled her application for a Disabled Facilities Grant. We have found fault by the Council causing injustice. The Council has agreed to remedy this by apologising to Miss Y and making a payment to reflect the distress and difficulties its fault caused Miss Y and her family.

  • Medway Council (23 010 348)

    Statement Not upheld Disabled facilities grants 13-Mar-2024

    Summary: Mr F complained the Council had refused to adapt his property and failed to provide sufficient respite care. We found no fault.

  • West Suffolk Council (23 014 915)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Disabled facilities grants 11-Mar-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s management of Mr X’s application for a disabled facilities grant. This is because most of the events complained about took place more than 12 months ago and it would have been reasonable for Mr X to refer them to us sooner. In addition, investigating the parts of the complaint that are within our jurisdiction would be unlikely to result in finding fault with the Council’s actions.

  • South Staffordshire District Council (23 010 119)

    Statement Upheld Disabled facilities grants 08-Mar-2024

    Summary: Mrs X complained the Council’s appointed contractor took too long to complete Disabled Facilities Grant works in her bathroom and the work was of a poor standard. We found fault because of the delay in completing the necessary adaptations to the bathroom. The Council has agreed to re-state its previous payment offer to Mrs X and assess any outstanding installation issues with Mrs X before agreeing how they should be fixed.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings