Archive has 78 results
-
Shropshire Council (20 002 256)
Statement Not upheld Traffic management 10-Nov-2020
Summary: The Ombudsman has discontinued his investigation into Mr C’s complaint about matters relating to traffic calming measures on his estate. This is because of the various jurisdictional reasons explained in this statement.
-
London Borough of Croydon (20 005 292)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 10-Nov-2020
Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about a penalty charge notice for a moving traffic contravention. It was reasonable for the complainant to have appealed to a tribunal against the penalty charge notice.
-
Cumbria County Council (20 003 254)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 06-Nov-2020
Summary: Mr X complained about the Council’s failure to complete roadworks and remove temporary traffic signals on a bridge in his area. The Ombudsman should not investigate this complaint. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault causing injustice which would warrant an investigation.
-
Devon County Council (20 005 297)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 02-Nov-2020
Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X’s complaints about the speed limit and state of the road outside his property. This is because Mr X’s injustice is not the result of fault by the Council and because it would be reasonable for him to take his concerns about highway disrepair and property damage to the courts.
-
Transport for London (20 004 902)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 28-Oct-2020
Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about a penalty charge notice for non-payment of the Congestion Charge. This is because the law provides a right of appeal to a tribunal.
-
Transport for London (20 003 694)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 22-Oct-2020
Summary: Mr X complained about being charged a £10 administration fee for renewing his application for an exemption from the authority’s congestion charge. The Ombudsman should not investigate this complaint. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault which would warrant an investigation.
-
Bristol City Council (20 005 080)
Statement Upheld Traffic management 21-Oct-2020
Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the changes the Council has made to the road layout in the City Centre. This is because the Council has already provided a suitable remedy and it is unlikely further investigation will lead to a different outcome.
-
London Borough of Camden (20 003 392)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 19-Oct-2020
Summary: Mr X complained about the Council’s consultation with the public over the introduction of a traffic management order for a cycling and pedestrian highways project near his home. The Ombudsman should not investigate this complaint. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault which would warrant an investigation.
-
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 13-Oct-2020
Summary: Mr X complained about the Council’s failure to put in place successful traffic management measures to prevent traffic speeding through his village. The Ombudsman should not investigate this complaint. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault which would warrant an investigation.
-
Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council (20 004 189)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 13-Oct-2020
Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint that the Council will not make changes to road markings suggested by the complainant. There is no evidence of fault by the Council.