Traffic management archive 2020-2021


Archive has 78 results

  • London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham (20 012 128)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 31-Mar-2021

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint about a local traffic issue. This is because there was no requirement for the Council to consult the residents’ association about the experimental traffic order and we cannot yet say whether any fault by the Council in the way it is currently discussing the matter with residents has affected the permanent outcome for them.

  • London Borough of Tower Hamlets (20 012 253)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 31-Mar-2021

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council not taking parking enforcement action near his address. There is not enough evidence of fault by the Council, or of significant injustice to Mr C, to warrant investigation.

  • Northumberland County Council (20 011 797)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 29-Mar-2021

    Summary: We will not investigate how the Council dealt with road safety concerns raised by the complainant for over six years. The complaint is made too late but investigation would not, in any case, achieve any different outcome. The Council has already addressed customer service issues arising from the complaint.

  • Transport for London (20 011 295)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 23-Mar-2021

    Summary: Mr X complained about Transport for London’s advice about congestion charge exemption for a vehicle which he bought. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault which would warrant an investigation.

  • London Borough of Bromley (20 005 081)

    Statement Not upheld Traffic management 19-Mar-2021

    Summary: Ms D complained about the Council’s decision to place a zebra crossing in front of her house without consulting her. We find the Council was not at fault.

  • Manchester City Council (20 011 572)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 16-Mar-2021

    Summary: Mr X complains about the Council’s decision to install traffic calming measures on a road near his home. Mr X says the restriction causes traffic congestion leading to unacceptable pollution. We will not investigate this complaint as we are unlikely to find fault in the way the Council reached its decision.

  • Suffolk County Council (20 010 716)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 02-Mar-2021

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Heavy Goods Vehicles (HGVs) in residential areas and traffic congestion. We cannot question a decision made by the Council where it has followed the correct process to make it. Part of the complaint is late with no good reasons to consider it now and there is not enough evidence of the Council’s actions causing Mr C a significant personal injustice to warrant an Ombudsman investigation.

  • East Sussex County Council (20 010 538)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 23-Feb-2021

    Summary: Mr X complained about the Council’s failure to take action over his concerns about traffic management in an area where he lives. We should not investigate this complaint. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault which would warrant an investigation.

  • Surrey County Council (20 010 406)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 23-Feb-2021

    Summary: Ms X complained about the Council’s refusal to force Heavy Goods Vehicles to use a by-pass instead of the road where she lives. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint. There is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council which warrants an investigation.

  • Somerset West and Taunton Council (20 010 234)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 23-Feb-2021

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about people riding cycles and e-scooters on the pavement. It is unlikely we would find evidence of fault by the Council.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings