Archive has 2 results
-
Carlton Court Care Home (19 021 064a)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Care and treatment 15-Feb-2021
Summary: Mr B complains about the care and support provided to his wife’s late cousin, Miss J, while resident in a home partly funded by the Council and the Clinical Commissioning Group. Mr B says Miss J suffered continuous weight loss and was unlawfully strapped to a chair for long periods by the Home during the last six months of her life. Mr B also complained about the decision to discharge Miss J from hospital and a failure to readmit her to hospital. Mr B’s complaint to the Ombudsmen is late and it is unlikely we can add to the previous investigation completed by the Council or achieve the outcome he wants.
-
Cambridgeshire & Peterborough Clinical Commissioning Group (18 014 139a)
Statement Upheld Care and treatment 04-Dec-2020
Summary: The Care Provider did not explain the extra charge it made for a ‘lifestyle premium’ and we cannot be sure that the complainant, the late Mrs J, would have chosen to pay this. It has agreed to refund half the total amount to Mrs J’s estate and review the advice it gives about this. The Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) Occupational Therapy service failed to complete an assessment and so it could not fund a specialist chair for Mrs J and she had to be nursed in bed. The CCG should refund the cost of the chair to the daughter and pay her £300 in recognition of her distress. It should also review how its OT provision is organised.