Archive has 895 results
-
London Borough of Camden (19 018 261)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 12-Mar-2020
Summary: The Ombudsman does not propose to investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of a planning application. This is because it would have been reasonable for Mr X and/or the applicant to appeal.
-
Statement Not upheld Planning applications 11-Mar-2020
Summary: Mr X complains about the Council’s decision to approve a planning application to turn a nearby agricultural building into holiday accommodation. Mr X says it will impact onto the amenities enjoyed by his holiday home. The Ombudsman has found no evidence of fault in the way the Council made its planning decision.
-
Aylesbury Vale District Council (19 017 999)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 11-Mar-2020
Summary: Mrs X complains about the way the Council has considered a planning application for a large number of dwellings near her. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint because planning permission has not yet been determined so no significant injustice has arisen (and is speculative).
-
Uttlesford District Council (19 018 336)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 11-Mar-2020
Summary: Mrs X complains about the way the Council considered planning applications for development in her village. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint because there is no evidence of fault by the Council causing significant injustice.
-
London Borough of Hillingdon (19 018 381)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 11-Mar-2020
Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s decision to refuse his application for a dropped kerb. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to warrant an investigation by the Ombudsman.
-
Torridge District Council (19 019 607)
Statement Not upheld Planning applications 10-Mar-2020
Summary: Mr X complains about the way the Council has handled a number of planning applications in his local area. The Ombudsman has stopped the investigation into these complaints. This is because the proposed developments have no direct impact on Mr X and in some cases decisions were taken too long ago for us to investigate now.
-
Torridge District Council (19 019 609)
Statement Not upheld Planning applications 10-Mar-2020
Summary: Mr X complains about the way the Council has handled a number of planning applications in his local area. The Ombudsman has stopped the investigation into these complaints. This is because the proposed developments have no direct impact on Mr X and in some cases decisions were taken too long ago for us to investigate now.
-
Torridge District Council (19 019 610)
Statement Not upheld Planning applications 10-Mar-2020
Summary: Mr X complains about the way the Council has handled a number of planning applications in his local area. The Ombudsman has stopped the investigation into these complaints. This is because the proposed developments have no direct impact on Mr X and in some cases decisions were taken too long ago for us to investigate now.
-
Torridge District Council (19 019 614)
Statement Not upheld Planning applications 10-Mar-2020
Summary: Mr X complains about the way the Council has handled a number of planning applications in his local area. The Ombudsman has stopped the investigation into these complaints. This is because the proposed developments have no direct impact on Mr X and in some cases decisions were taken too long ago for us to investigate now.
-
Torridge District Council (19 019 615)
Statement Not upheld Planning applications 10-Mar-2020
Summary: Mr X complains about the way the Council has handled a number of planning applications in his local area. The Ombudsman has stopped the investigation into these complaints. This is because the proposed developments have no direct impact on Mr X and in some cases decisions were taken too long ago for us to investigate now.