Archive has 842 results
-
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead Council (19 019 381)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 27-Mar-2020
Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s consideration of and decision on a planning application for a property extension near his house. There is not enough evidence of fault by the Council in how it dealt with the application to warrant an Ombudsman investigation.
-
London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham (19 009 025)
Statement Not upheld Planning applications 27-Mar-2020
Summary: There was no fault in how the Council reached its decisions to grant planning permission for development near Mr X’s home.
-
Chelmsford City Council (19 011 087)
Statement Not upheld Planning applications 26-Mar-2020
Summary: There is no fault in the way the Council considered the impact of a dormer extension on Mrs X’s property. There is also no fault in the Council deciding the addition of a flue to a single storey extension is covered under permitted development rules.
-
East Devon District Council (19 012 564)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 26-Mar-2020
Summary: Mr X complained the Council approved a development opposite his home that affects his privacy. The complaint was brought to us outside our 12-month time limit for investigations and there is no good reason to investigate it now.
-
Maidstone Borough Council (19 015 413)
Statement Upheld Planning applications 26-Mar-2020
Summary: Mrs X complained the Council failed to properly consider a planning application that affected her privacy. There was fault in the way the Council made its decision, but by the time we investigated the complaint, the Council had already found a satisfactory remedy for the impact on Mrs X. The Council has approved amended plans which should ensure a window facing Mrs X is obscured and fixed shut below a certain height.
-
Cambridge City Council (19 019 337)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 26-Mar-2020
Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a planning application for a development near the complainant’s home. This is because parts of the complaint are late and it is unlikely the Ombudsman would find fault in relation to the more recent issues.
-
North Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council (19 013 170)
Statement Not upheld Planning applications 25-Mar-2020
Summary: Ms X complained about the Council’s handling of a neighbour’s planning application. There was no fault in the consultation process or in the Council’s consideration of the application.
-
Shropshire Council (19 001 467)
Statement Not upheld Planning applications 25-Mar-2020
Summary: Mrs B complains about the Council’s pre-planning application advice that was inconsistent with the comments it made about her subsequent planning application. The Ombudsman has found no fault.
-
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 25-Mar-2020
Summary: Mr X complains the Council failed to follow the correct process before granting planning permission for demolition and replacement of a bungalow close to his home. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint as we are unlikely to find fault in the Councils actions. Nor can we achieve the outcome Mr X is seeking.
-
Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council (19 019 863)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 24-Mar-2020
Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about delay by the Council in determining her planning application. This is because it would be reasonable for Mrs X to appeal to the Planning Inspectorate.