Enforcement archive 2019-2020


Archive has 287 results

  • Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council (19 004 900)

    Statement Not upheld Enforcement 20-Mar-2020

    Summary: Mr X complained the Council failed to take enforcement action against his neighbour, who he alleges has started a business in a garage behind his home. The Council has investigated his allegations but found no evidence of a change of use. There was no fault in the way the Council carried out its enforcement investigation.

  • Epping Forest District Council (19 005 808)

    Statement Upheld Enforcement 20-Mar-2020

    Summary: Ms X complains the Council has failed to resolve a breach of planning control by her neighbour. The Ombudsman finds no fault causing significant injustice in how the Council dealt with the breach. However, the Ombudsman has found fault in how the Council handled the complaint.

  • Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council (19 005 922)

    Statement Upheld Enforcement 20-Mar-2020

    Summary: Mr C complains the Council failed to respond properly and take effective action in response to his reports about the commercial storage and dealing in scrap at a neighbouring property which he says has a harmful impact on the area’s amenity. The Ombudsman has found delay by the Council but considers the agreed actions of an apology and procedural review are enough to provide a suitable remedy to Mr C.

  • London Borough of Barnet (19 008 411)

    Statement Not upheld Enforcement 20-Mar-2020

    Summary: Mr X complained the Council was slow to take enforcement action. The matter is now the subject of an appeal to the Planning Inspectorate. We should not investigate further, as the decision on whether the impact on public amenity is unacceptable, will be made by the Planning Inspectorate, which is a body outside of our remit.

  • Maidstone Borough Council (19 018 128)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Enforcement 20-Mar-2020

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about the Council not pursuing planning enforcement action against an alleged breach of an occupancy condition attached to a dwelling. This is because the alleged fault by the Council has not caused the complainant a significant personal injustice.

  • London Borough of Haringey (19 019 009)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Enforcement 20-Mar-2020

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not Mr X’s complaint about the Council issuing an enforcement notice. I consider it reasonable for him to have exercised his right to appeal to the Planning Inspector at the time the notice was issued.

  • Cornwall Council (18 007 571)

    Statement Not upheld Enforcement 19-Mar-2020

    Summary: Mr X complains the Council failed to take enforcement action regarding a development. The Ombudsman’s decision is that there is no fault by the Council causing injustice.

  • Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council (19 008 756)

    Statement Not upheld Enforcement 18-Mar-2020

    Summary: Mr C complains the Council failed to respond properly and take appropriate action in response to his reports of increased land levels at a nearby development. Mr C says he will suffer from a lack of privacy and potential future drainage and sewerage issues. The Ombudsman has found no evidence of fault by the Council.

  • Wakefield City Council (18 015 662)

    Statement Upheld Enforcement 18-Mar-2020

    Summary: The Ombudsman found fault on Mr Y’s complaint about how the Council dealt with reports about a neighbouring takeaway’s flue which had no planning consent and caused a nuisance. The Council could have considered serving an enforcement notice earlier but this caused no significant injustice. There was a failure of the environmental health team to communicate and co-ordinate with the planning enforcement team on some of its decisions. The agreed action remedies any injustice caused.

  • Warrington Council (19 017 845)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Enforcement 18-Mar-2020

    Summary: Mr X complains that the Council has not taken planning enforcement action against a neighbour for running a business from a residential dwelling. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint because there is no evidence of fault by the Council causing significant injustice.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings