Archive has 250 results
-
Southampton City Council (19 004 550)
Statement Not upheld School admissions 22-Nov-2019
Summary: Mrs C complains about the Council’s decision not to agree to her and her husband’s request to allow their summer-born daughter to enter school in the reception year when she started school. Mrs C says the Council used the wrong tests and did not consider their views, or the evidence they submitted. The Ombudsman finds no fault, so cannot question the merits of the Council’s decision.
-
Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council (19 012 477)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries School admissions 19-Nov-2019
Summary: The Ombudsman does not have reason to investigate this complaint about the Council’s refusal to allow a parent a second school admission appeal. This is because there is no sign of fault by the Council regarding this matter.
-
Lancashire County Council (19 005 604)
Statement Upheld School admissions 19-Nov-2019
Summary: Mr B complained that the independent appeal panel failed to properly consider his appeal against the refusal of a place for his son at his preferred school. The Ombudsman finds there was fault in the way the appeal panel considered Mr B’s appeal. To remedy the injustice caused, the Council has agreed to offer Mr B a new appeal.
-
St Peter's RC High School, Wigan (19 005 812)
Statement Upheld School admissions 19-Nov-2019
Summary: Miss F complained the admission appeals panel failed to properly consider her appeal for her son, G. There is evidence of fault and the school has agreed to arrange a fresh appeal.
-
Kent County Council (19 003 784)
Statement Upheld School admissions 18-Nov-2019
Summary: Mrs B says the admissions appeal panel failed to properly consider her daughter’s appeal or explain its decision. The appeal panel failed to keep notes of its scoring when awarding places at appeal and the decision letter failed to properly explain the appeal panel’s decision. That did not affect the decision not to offer Mrs B’s daughter a place at the school. An apology, agreement to ensure the appeal panel keeps notes of the reasons for its scoring in future and to ensure decision letters properly explain the appeal panel’s reasoning is satisfactory remedy.
-
St Paul's Catholic College (Sunbury-on-Thames) (19 004 918)
Statement Not upheld School admissions 18-Nov-2019
Summary: Mr X complained about a school admission appeal. He said the Panel did not properly consider his case. The Ombudsman found no evidence of fault.
-
Southend-on-Sea City Council (19 006 410)
Statement Not upheld School admissions 15-Nov-2019
Summary: Ms M’s complains following her unsuccessful appeal for a place for her daughter, G, at an infant school. G has since been offered a place at the school, so I have ended my investigation.
-
St Bede's School, Redhill (19 004 129)
Statement Not upheld School admissions 14-Nov-2019
Summary: The complainant says the school admissions authority failed to properly consider her appeal against its decision to refuse a place at a local school. The admissions authority says it followed the correct procedure and considered the grounds for appeal put forward. However it decided they did not outweigh the prejudice to the education of other pupils admitting a further pupil would cause. The Ombudsman finds the admission’s authority acted without fault.
-
West Sussex County Council (19 005 355)
Statement Upheld School admissions 13-Nov-2019
Summary: Ms X complains the Council did not properly consider her request for her summer born daughter to delay starting school into Reception until after she reaches compulsory school age. She says the Council has not explained how entry into Year 1 in September 2020 would be in her best interest. The Ombudsman finds fault with the Council’s decision-making process. We have recommended the Council apologise, remake its decision, and review its pending decisions in other similar cases.
-
Gloucestershire County Council (19 006 791)
Statement Not upheld School admissions 13-Nov-2019
Summary: Miss X complains about the way an Education Admission Appeal Panel considered her appeal for a place in primary school. We have discontinued our investigation as we were unable to contact Miss X about her complaint.