Other archive 2019-2020


Archive has 78 results

  • Tadworth Grove Nursing & Residential Home (18 002 950b)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 13-May-2019

    Summary: The Ombudsmen will not investigate Ms R’s complaint about the care provided to her late partner, Mr B, in two nursing homes and a hospital Trust, and about the Council’s actions in relation to safeguarding and her partner’s best interests. We are unlikely to find fault in the actions of the Council, the nursing homes and the Trust. We are also unlikely to be able to resolve the conflicting accounts between Ms R and the organisations she complains about.

  • University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (18 002 950c)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 13-May-2019

    Summary: The Ombudsmen will not investigate Ms R’s complaint about the care provided to her late partner, Mr B, in two nursing homes and a hospital Trust, and about the Council’s actions in relation to safeguarding and her partner’s best interests. We are unlikely to find fault in the actions of the Council, the nursing homes and the Trust. We are also unlikely to be able to resolve the conflicting accounts between Ms R and the organisations she complains about.

  • Wolverhampton Clinical Commissioning Group (17 013 455a)

    Statement Not upheld Other 09-May-2019

    Summary: The Ombudsmen has not found fault by a Council, an NHS Trust or a CCG with their assessment and/or consideration of continuing healthcare funding. The Ombudsmen found fault by a GP Practice in not considering fast-tracking a continuing healthcare assessment. The Practice has already accepted the fault and taken action to learn from the complaint. A retrospective continuing healthcare review which the CCG has agreed to will remedy any potential financial injustice.

  • Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust (18 009 622a)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 02-May-2019

    Summary: The Ombudsmen will not investigate a complaint about the care and treatment the complainants’ son received in supported living, and the way a Trust handled an internal investigation. The complaints are late and there are insufficient grounds to accept them now

  • Oxfordshire Clinical Commissioning Group (18 009 622b)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 02-May-2019

    Summary: The Ombudsmen will not investigate a complaint about the care and treatment the complainants’ son received in supported living, and the way a Trust handled an internal investigation. The complaints are late and there are insufficient grounds to accept them now

  • Vale Of York Clinical Commissioning Group (18 009 620a)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 01-May-2019

    Summary: The Ombudsmen will not investigate a complaint about the care the complainants’ son received in supporting living. The complaint is late and there are insufficient grounds to accept it now.

  • Mencap (18 009 620b)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 01-May-2019

    Summary: The Ombudsmen will not investigate a complaint about the care the complainants’ son received in supporting living. The complaint is late and there are insufficient grounds to accept it now.

  • North East Lincolnshire Clinical Commissioning Group (17 014 253a)

    Statement Not upheld Other 29-Apr-2019

    Summary: The Ombudsmen do not consider Northern Lincolnshire & Goole NHS Foundation Trust’s (the Trust) decision to remove M from the watchful wait list in January 2017 was fault. However, the Trust should have told Miss L it removed M from the watchful wait list in July 2016, before it later reinstated him. The Ombudsmen do not consider the Trust unnecessary delayed sending M for an autism assessment. Also, Lincolnshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust’s autism assessment of M was in line with the relevant guidelines.

  • Northern Lincolnshire & Goole NHS Foundation Trust (17 014 253b)

    Statement Upheld Other 29-Apr-2019

    Summary: The Ombudsmen do not consider Northern Lincolnshire & Goole NHS Foundation Trust’s (the Trust) decision to remove M from the watchful wait list in January 2017 was fault. However, the Trust should have told Miss L it removed M from the watchful wait list in July 2016, before it later reinstated him. The Ombudsmen do not consider the Trust unnecessary delayed sending M for an autism assessment. Also, Lincolnshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust’s autism assessment of M was in line with the relevant guidelines.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings