Local Government Ombudsman

> | Accessiblity Options | Text Only | Text Size: A+ A- Reset | Links | Site Map

You are here: Home : : News and press : : 2009 : : October : : Ombudsman criticises Ravensbourne School for "significant breaches" of the admission appeals code

What's new

Browser support

Browse aloud

Click here for speech assisted browser support

Downloads

Site tools

Files with this symbol pdf icon are in .pdf format. To view these files you will need the Adobe Acrobat Reader software. It can be downloaded below free of charge. Click To Download

adobe acrobat reader

Ombudsman criticises Ravensbourne School for "significant breaches" of the admission appeals code

Archived press release

Date Published: 06/10/09

There were “significant faults” in how a school admission appeal was conducted at the Ravensbourne School.

In his report, issued today (6 October 2009) Ombudsman Jerry White says: “The investigation … has identified a number of significant breaches of the [statutory School Admission Appeals] Code and has revealed wider areas of concern.”

‘Mr and Mrs Stirling’ (not their real name for legal reasons) complained about the way their appeal for a place for their son at the Ravensbourne School was considered. The Ravensbourne School is a Foundation High School responsible for its own admission arrangements. The investigation revealed a number of significant faults in how the appeal was conducted. These were:

  • The Clerk had not received appropriate training and consequently did not understand her role.
  • One panel member had not received appropriate training.
  • The Clerk’s recording of the Panel’s decision was inadequate.
  • There was no evidence that the Panel satisfied itself that the admission’s arrangements had been properly applied.
  • There was no evidence that the Panel satisfied itself that the School had made its case that the admission of a further pupil would prejudice the efficient use of education and resources at the School.
  • The Panel’s decision letter failed to explain why it refused the complainants’ appeal.

The Ombudsman finds maladministration causing injustice and recommends that the
Governing Body should: 

  • Make a compensation payment of £250 to Mr and Mrs Stirling.
  • Review the arrangements for and conduct of Appeal Panels to ensure they comply with the requirements of the Code.

The Ombudsman says: “I recognise the difficulties faced by admission authorities in finding suitable members and clerks and to ensure they are trained … While I acknowledge these difficulties, admission authorities have a duty to ensure that they arrange and conduct appeals in accordance with the Code so appellants can be confident that proper process has been followed and that their appeals have been properly and fairly considered.”

Report reference: 08 014 474