Enforcement


Recent statements in this category are shown below:

  • Hinckley & Bosworth Borough Council (16 018 318)

    Statement Upheld Enforcement 21-Aug-2017

    Summary: I uphold this complaint about planning enforcement as there was fault by the Council but the actions it has already taken are enough to provide a suitable remedy.

  • Thurrock Council (17 000 851)

    Statement Not upheld Enforcement 18-Aug-2017

    Summary: The Council was not at fault in how it dealt with X's further information and correspondence about a planning permission.

  • Cannock Chase District Council (16 017 805)

    Statement Not upheld Enforcement 15-Aug-2017

    Summary: The Council's actions in respect of planning enforcement were not affected by fault causing injustice.

  • Cannock Chase District Council (16 017 790)

    Statement Not upheld Enforcement 15-Aug-2017

    Summary: The Council's actions in respect of planning enforcement were not affected by fault causing injustice.

  • Epping Forest District Council (17 005 792)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Enforcement 15-Aug-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about the Council's alleged failure to take enforcement action about alleged breach of planning control. He is unlikely to find fault in the Council's actions.

  • Brighton & Hove City Council (17 000 310)

    Statement Not upheld Enforcement 14-Aug-2017

    Summary: I do not uphold this complaint as there was no fault by the Council in the way it responded to a report of unauthorised works to a listed building.

  • Horsham District Council (16 010 649)

    Statement Upheld Enforcement 10-Aug-2017

    Summary: the Council properly considered whether to take enforcement action over alleged breaches of planning control at a restaurant. And it properly investigated Mr X's complaints about noise from the restaurant. But although it did not investigate Mr X's allegation that an acoustic report was flawed, this did not cause him any injustice.

  • Forest Heath District Council (17 005 441)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Enforcement 08-Aug-2017

    Summary: the Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint that the Council has failed to take action over contractors parking on Mr X's road. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council, and other bodies may be better placed to deal with the complaint.

  • Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council (17 000 291)

    Statement Upheld Enforcement 04-Aug-2017

    Summary: Mr X complains of unreasonable delay by the Council in its handling of planning enforcement and building control complaints made by him and other leaseholders of a building. There was unreasonable delay by the Council but it has recently taken steps to address the outstanding planning enforcement matters. The Council committed to this proactive approach in settlement of the complaint.

  • Waverley Borough Council (16 015 808)

    Statement Not upheld Enforcement 04-Aug-2017

    Summary: There is no fault in the Council's decision to discharge a planning condition for a development near Mr X's home.

;