> | Accessiblity Options | Text Only | Text Size: A+ A- Reset | Links | Site Map
LGO Advice Team: 0300 061 0614
Quality and efficiency
Click here for speech assisted browser support
Files with this symbol are in .pdf format. To view these files you will need the Adobe Acrobat Reader software. It can be downloaded below free of charge. Click To Download
Planning applications Maladministration causing injustice
24 July 2008
Plymouth City Council delayed unreasonably in completing work to allow a couple to transfer part of their property to their son. The Ombudsman says “I consider the delays in providing a response remain unjustified” and that the couple’s solicitor incurred extra costs as a result. ‘Mr Cole’ (not his real name for legal reasons), a solicitor acting for a couple selling their property, applied to the Council for the lifting of a restriction on the property so that they could transfer part of the land to their son prior to selling. The restriction was in the form of a section 106 agreement and so the Council needed to complete a Land Registry form. Mr Cole had to contact the Land Registry on three occasions to seek an extension of time because of the Council’s delay in completing the required form. As a result, Mr Cole incurred extra costs which at this point he has not passed onto his clients. The Ombudsman found that the Council had unreasonably delayed in completing the requested form as it has been unable to justify the time taken. The extra effort and costs incurred by Mr Cole could have been avoided if the Council had properly explained at the outset the time that the process would take. The Ombudsman also found that the Council had failed to deal with Mr Cole’s complaints in a timely manner. The Ombudsman finds maladministration causing injustice and recommends the Council to pay £400 to Mr Cole.
Date Updated: 10/10/08