Local Government Ombudsman
You are here: Home : : Complaint outcomes : : Planning : : Planning archive 2007-08 : : King’s Lynn & West Norfolk Borough Council (06B06809)

Quality and efficiency

Downloads

Site tools

King’s Lynn & West Norfolk Borough Council (06B06809)

Planning applications                 Maladministration causing injustice

11 July 2007

King’s Lynn and West Norfolk Council approved a planning application for new village homes on land designated as ‘greenfield’, and decided to redesignate the site as ‘brownfield’, contrary to Government definition and its own policies. In his report the Ombudsman criticises the Council’s decision making, although, had the matter been dealt with properly, a smaller housing scheme might still have been approved on the site. The Council has accepted his criticism and agreed to follow his recommendations to improve its procedures, apologise and pay compensation to the complainants, who lived next to the application site.

‘Mr and Mrs Able’ (not their real names for legal reasons) moved to a village house next to a plot of greenfield land that had recently been used for agriculture. The Council approved a planning application for six houses on this site, and members decided that they could redesignate it as brownfield land, thus bringing the disused stockyard area into residential use. This was contrary to the Government’s definition of brownfield land, to the Council’s own adopted policies, and to the recommendation of the planning officers who had assessed the site.

However, it is possible that, had members considered the matter properly, consent might have been given for a more modest scheme of five houses or fewer that accorded with the Council’s adopted policy position.

The Ombudsman finds maladministration, and the Council has accepted his criticisms of its decision-making process and has offered to follow his recommendations to remedy the injustice. It has agreed to:

  • apologise to Mr and Mrs Able for the failure in proper decision making;
  • promote further discussion with all members of the Development Control Board about the proper exercise of their discretion;
  • ensure robust professional planning and legal advice is available to the Development Control Board so that, if members are minded to go beyond adopted policy, there are material planning grounds for doing so that are properly recorded; and
  • pay Mr and Mrs Able £750 for their distress and outrage at the way this matter has been handled.

Date Published: 17/10/08