Planning archive 2016-2017


Archive has 5 results

  • Plymouth City Council (15 015 955)

    Report Upheld Enforcement 01-Sep-2016

    Summary: Complaint from a couple and their neighbour that the council did not tell them about a major planning application which affected their homes. This denied them the opportunity to have their objections and their amenity considered. By retrospectively changing plans on the decision notice, the council denied them the opportunity to apply for judicial review.

  • Plymouth City Council (15 015 963)

    Report Upheld Enforcement 01-Sep-2016

    Summary: Complaint from a couple and their neighbour that the council did not tell them about a major planning application which affected their homes. This denied them the opportunity to have their objections and their amenity considered. By retrospectively changing plans on the decision notice, the council denied them the opportunity to apply for judicial review.

  • St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council (15 009 133 )

    Report Upheld Planning applications 29-Jun-2016

    Summary: Complaint from two men that the council's decision to allow a replacement dwelling house in Green Belt was affected by inconsistencies, errors, omissions and a lack of policy guidelines. They say the decision to allow so large a house will harm the openness of the Green Belt, it harm their amenity and its construction will lead to the loss of mature landscaping.

  • St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council (15 010 742)

    Report Upheld Planning applications 29-Jun-2016

    Summary: Complaint from two men that the council's decision to allow a replacement dwelling house in Green Belt was affected by inconsistencies, errors, omissions and a lack of policy guidelines. They say the decision to allow so large a house will harm the openness of the Green Belt, it will harm their amenity and its construction will lead to the loss of mature landscaping.

  • London Borough of Hackney (14 006 093)

    Report Upheld Enforcement 10-May-2016

    Summary: A man complains the council has not taken direct action to remove an unauthorised extension built by his neighbour in 2006 and subject to an enforcement notice issued in February 2009.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings