Planning archive 2007-2008


Archive has 27 results

  • Bath and North East Somerset Council (05B08418)

    Report Upheld Enforcement 27-Mar-2008

    Summary: Bath & North East Somerset Council overlooked the existence of an agreement that a site had the benefit of an established industrial use fallback position, and incorrectly threatened to take enforcement action against the owner.

  • Bath and North East Somerset Council (05B15565)

    Report Upheld Enforcement 30-Jan-2008

    Summary: Bath and North East Somerset Council has been criticised by the Ombudsman over planning matters at a green belt site next to an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty and close to a World Heritage site.

  • Plymouth City Council (06B15306)

    Report Upheld Enforcement 21-Jan-2008

    Summary: forcement Maladministration causing injustice21 January 2008Plymouth City Council delayed in taking enforcement action over non-compliance with planning conditions at industrial premises

  • East Cambridgeshire District Council (05B01966)

    Report Upheld Planning applications 10-Jan-2008

    Summary: Four residents complained about the way the Council dealt with a planning application that led to the development of their homes on land that was formerly the site of a gasworks. They said that the Council had failed to ensure that the land their homes were built on was properly decontaminated prior to construction.

  • Restormel Borough Council (06B11183)

    Report Upheld Enforcement 09-Jan-2008

    Summary: Ms X complained on behalf of a small group of residents of a rural hamlet about the way the Council dealt with activities at a nearby business that did not have planning permission.

  • London Borough of Ealing (07A06930)

    Report Upheld Enforcement 06-Dec-2007

    Summary: Ealing Council's error allowed a roof extension to be built that was larger than should have been permitted.

  • Woking Borough Council (06A16418)

    Report Upheld Planning applications 31-Oct-2007

    Summary: Woking Council's misunderstanding of legal requirements led it to miss the 56-day deadline for refusal of a 'prior approval' application for a mobile phone mast.

  • Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council (06B01186)

    Report Upheld Planning applications 31-Oct-2007

    Summary: Dudley Council's consideration of a revised detailed planning application for a housing development was flawed.

  • Macclesfield Borough Council (06C01990)

    Report Upheld Planning applications 30-Oct-2007

    Summary: An error over dates meant that Macclesfield Council lost the opportunity to refuse permission for a new telephone mast.

  • Herefordshire Council (06B14891)

    Report Upheld Planning applications 10-Oct-2007

    Summary: Mr Martin' (not his real name) lived in a cottage in a rural part of Herefordshire, surrounded by fields. The son of a nearby farmer applied for planning permission for a smithy and stables with a farrier's cottage and apprentice flat on land adjacent to Mr Martin's property. Mr Martin complained that the Council's planning committee approved the application against the officer's recommendation.

;